Jammu and Kashmir - A Victim: A Victim of Personal Ambitions of Some and Mishandling by the Core Indian Leadership
Daya Sagar
List Price : US$ 34.79 Our Price : US$ 27.83
You Save 20% + FREE DELIVERY WORLDWIDE
PRODUCT DETAILS
Book ID : 44178
ISBN-10 : 81-8430-313-0 / 8184303130
ISBN-13 : 978-81-8430-313-1 / 9788184303131
Place
of Publication :
Delhi
Year
of Publication :
2015
Edition : (First Edition)
Language : English
390p., 23 cm.
CONTENTS
CONTENTS:- 1. Let There be No Debates on the History and Nationality of Kashmir 2. Identities of Jammu & Kashmir 3. Princely State (of the British Indian Empire) of Jammu and Kashmir 4. Vital Statistical Images of the Pre-October 1947 and Post-1947 face of Indian State of J&K 5. Need for Clearing Some Misunderstandings 6. Unrest against the British 7. British Cabinet Mission and Indian Princes 8. Quit Kashmir Call, Nehru, Patel, All India State People's Conference 9. Sheikh Abdullah wanted a Different Plan of Action for J&K 10. Nehru's support to Sheikh Abdullah annoyed Maharaja Hari Singh 11. Princely States, Princes and Dominions 12. Final Radcliffe Award on Boundaries could also be the Reason 13. Was Nehru's Nominee Sheikh the Cause for Delay? 14. Historical Ties of Jammu and Kashmir 15. The Failure of the Government 16. Princely State of J&K Acceded to the Indian Dominion 17. Accession could be done even after 15th August, 1947 18. It is a Point Here 19. Separatists Quote and Use 20. Earlier the people of J&K took Pakistan as an Aggressor 21. Exile of Families 22. Mountbatten was a Close Family Associate of Nehru 23. A Brief on Political Activism and Jammu & Kashmir 24. Cabinet Mission Plans, Accessions and Instrument of Accession 25. Nehru did not want to take Any Chance 26. 'Quit Kashmir' Call of Sheikh Abdullah 27. Indian Independence Act too not Well Carried 28. Standstill Agreement 29. Pakistan Violates Standstill Agreement 30. India did not Immediately Extend Military Help 31. Menon did Succeed in Making Hari Singh a Little Soft 32. Sheikh Abdullah Pledged Loyalty 33. May be Hari Singh would have Done it Earlier 34. Indian Complaint to Security Council 35. UN did not do anything to get the Lands of J&K Cleared of Invader 36. Start of Local Governance in Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir 37. Mountbatten and Nehru had made the Maharaja of J&K helpless before Sheikh Abdullah 38. Sheikh Abdullah too Feared 39. Sheikh became a Socio-political Problem for Nehru 40. Sheikh made Mockery of Maharaja's Authority with the Support of Delhi 41. At Last Hari Singh was made to Leave the State 42. Maharaja had left J&K Temporarily in June 1949 but could not Return 43. Ultimate Authority Rested in Maharaja and/or the Regent Yuvraj Karan Singh 44. The Praja Sabha - Constitution of J&K, 1996 Samvat Constituent Assembly - Legislative Assembly 45. Constituent Assembly of J&K and Ratification of Accession 46. Better Only go by the Recorded/Approved Actions 47. Constitution of J&K is to legislate on a "Shadow State List" 48. Article 370 of Constitution of India 49. Article 370 of Constitution of India - A Temporary Provision 50. 'J&K is an Integral Part of India' - says Section 3 of Constitution. Where does PDP Self Rule Stand? 51. Delhi Agreement, 1952 52. Indira-Sheikh Accord, 1974 53. If Constitution of J&K is Legal, the Amendments cannot be alleged as Illegal Erosion 54. Valley-centric Approach: Muslim Majority Areas of Jammu too Suffer 55. Separatists too Unduly Use Article 370 as a Tool 56. Myths: Explanations: Claims that Need to be Addressed 57. Epilogue 58. List of Annexures
DESCRIPTION
After 1945, the face of Indian State of J&K was allowed to be painted by some to the benefit of external and internal disruptive elements. Not only this, questions like delayed accession of Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir, 'conditional' accession, Article 370 of Constitution of India, dual 'citizenship' for subjects of Jammu & Kashmir and 'commitments' made with Kashmiries have not been adequately addressed even by Government of India for six decades. Even Art-370 of Constitution of India has been pushed into unfair controversies. Affairs concerning the Indian state of J&K have been the victim of mishandling. Local J&K political leadership has been resting her stakes more only on local governance.
